Sam Bankman-Fried is about to walk into a brutal interrogation
At a glance Mark Cohen spent hours last week getting his client’s version of numerous aspects of his alleged crimes. Bankman-Fried testified he was unaware of many elements of the fraud, including Alameda Research’s various special privileges. This laundry list of denials leaves government prosecutors spoiled for choice of topics in their cross-examination — and we’ve already seen Bankman-Fried collapse under questioning from assistant US attorney (AUSA) Danielle Sassoon. A question hovers over this strategic oddity: Are the high-profile defense lawyers crafting their own strategy? Or are they taking marching orders from the delusional Bankman-Fried and his parents? Sam Bankman-Fried seemed calm and confident in his first testimony before the jury in his own defense on Friday, October 27. But with prosecutors set to cross-examine the former FTX CEO as early as Monday, that confidence and sense of calm will likely evaporate. That’s in part because the defense’s direct quest...